( Article translated Megachip )
of Steve Watson - Infowars.com In a pointed editorial comment Megachip .
Peter Power reveals the name of the company he worked with on the morning of the London bombings
Peter Power is the man who oversaw the tutorials on terrorist attacks in London during the morning of August 7, 2005 , just as it was in during a real attack. After a long silence three and a half games, the former head of Scotland Yard's anti-terrorism department, told more details of the background to these events with a statement that was the terminus in the comments section a blog. The site, at the time, was commenting on allegations that the Power had released to the BBC a week ago.
As we wrote earlier, the expert in crisis management has shown that some companies have taken advantage of the armor plating of London (which occurred on Wednesday, due to protests against the G20) to stage an exercise which had as its object a pandemic influence. When
blog Uncensored Magazine posted an article on the activities of Peter Power, he replied with a lengthy statement in which he reveals that the company he worked for 7 August was Reed Elsevier, the giant London-based information.
The company is mostly known for his legal database Lexis / Nexis, as well as have other sources of information: for example, produces a large number of scientific journals, including some of the largest and most respected. Reed is also a famous host of impressive exhibitions or events. Among other things, owns part of the Excel Centre in the port area of \u200b\u200bLondon, where last weekend was held on the G20.
Here is the full version of the declaration of Peter Power: "Regarding the exercise of the July 7, 2005, and the parallels with the attack that day, have been said a bunch of nonsense. Since then, I have tried repeatedly to comment personally on numerous internet sites, more and more zealous of their conspiracy theories are avoiding any rational debate on the subject. It seems that those who are ready to enter any coincidence in an elaborate conspiracy theory are not inclined to dialogue with those who want to offer a different perspective. However, I have not lost all hope. So I hope, perhaps naively, that left some readers interested in reading an honest and factual account of the exercise that my company has done that day three years ago.
Unfortunately, in 2008 the BBC has postponed a television program (Of his series on conspiracies) that would shed light on these events. As the executive producer and his staff were very fair (many conspiracy theorists were invited to participate), three years ago our client has agreed to mention the name of his company in the documentary. We even granted to the BBC all the material on exercise in our possession. Unfortunately, in 2008, the broadcast was blocked, because it could interfere with an ongoing process. The broadcaster was forced to postpone it to 2009.
early 2005, Reed Elsevier, a company specializing in the world of journalism and information, which employs a thousand people in and around London, asked us to help them prepare a plan for crisis management and to conduct an exercise that put him in place. We have developed a variety of drafts for different scenarios and, finally, we set the exercise date: July 7 at 9:00.
The exercise that we developed was a series of procedures that six people (the management team of the crisis) would have to put in place. We put everything on PowerPoint. Our headquarters and location of the exercise, was an office near Chancery Lane, in the center of London. Since many staff members came to work on the subway, we chose to base the exercise su un attacco con esplosivi incendiari a tre vagoni della metro. Abbiamo usato come modello un vero attentato dell’IRA del ‘92 ed altri simili.
La metropolitana londinese è stata vittima di ben 18 attentati negli anni precedenti al 2005: sceglierla era una cosa logica, non chissà che precognizione. Se teniamo questo a mente, non ci stupisce constatare che la Deutsche Bank ha svolto un’esercitazione simile qualche giorno prima di noi e, ancora prima di questa, un’esercitazione interaziendale (e molto pubblicizzata) chiamata Osiris II ha simulato un attentato alla stazione Bank. Inoltre, nel 2004 ho partecipato a una puntata di BBC Panorama insieme a Michael Portillo, in cui abbiamo discusso di come Londra avrebbe potuto reagire certain terrorist acts (which in this case were fictitious, staged by the BBC).
In short, much of the research on which our practice was based had already been made. The scenario that we developed for our client began with a series of false news (taken from the above-mentioned transmission Panorama) and the events in question are developed only on the screen, as in any other exercise of this type. They were told by a facilitator, not external factors or actions that do not happen in our office. We have included in our scenario also the explosion of a bomb near the office of the magazine 'Jewish Chronicle': our imaginary terrorists were aware that this was the place where they would be passed through many of the commuters who were heading to their work, since some of the metro stations were to close. Of the eight metro stations which have been covered in the tutorial, we chose three. Just the three that have been affected by the tragic events of July 7, 2005. It was a confirmation of the validity of our scenario, although we would rather do without.
is not unusual for an exercise turns into a real crisis. For example, in January 2003, thirty people were injured when the derailment of a subway wagons has thrown against a wall. Meanwhile, the London police were doing a similar exercise, che il reparto vittime dovette interrompere per andare ad occuparsi dell’evento reale.
Un numero sorprendente di persone non riesce ad accettare queste coincidenze come tali. Credono che debba esserci dietro una cospirazione. Rifiutano di accettare che, se si svolge un’indagine approfondita per sviluppare il proprio scenario, si otterrà un’esercitazione i cui contenuti sono altamente probabili. Comunque, l’unico motivo per cui ho acconsentito a parlare in TV quel giorno, quando c’era ancora molta confusione sull’attentato, era quello di incoraggiare altre organizzazioni a pianificare nuove esercitazioni. Sappiamo bene che la minaccia del terrorismo è, e rimane, reale. Una conseguenza di questo è che, senza deserve it, Islam, a great Abrahamic and monotheistic faith (along with Judaism and Christianity), has become the object of hate for many people. "
To recap: the afternoon of July 7, 2005, Power has revealed a BBC radio interviewer that his company was doing for an unspecified group of a thousand people a tutorial focused on the explosion of three simultaneous bombings in three Underground stations at the same time the attack real place.
Here is the transcript of the interview broadcast.
PETER POWER: "At half past eight this morning we were conducting an exercise for a company that has over a thousand people in London, where we considered an attack identical to the one happened this morning. I still have my hair straight with fear. "
BBC:" To understand: you were conducting an exercise to see how we should react to an attack that really happened then? "
POWER:" Precisely. We planned about nine o'clock, for a company that obviously I'd rather not mention, even though I know they're listening and they know everything. We had a room full of experts in crisis management that had just met for the first time and so, in five minutes, we realized that we had developed really was happening. We quickly decided to implement all necessary measures to contain the crisis. "
Such a coincidence is absolutely incredible and, for this reason, some believe that the plan of Power has been put in place in advance or used by people who already knew before the attacks took place.
The same thing happened on 11 September, when some exercises focusing on the hijacked planes were superimposed on real hijackings. Some think that the exercises could serve as a cover for the attack, when its leaders were captured.
Power has alluded to the nature of these simulations after July 7, in an attempt to dampen the significance of these coincidences.
Less than a week after the attack, but Power and consultants of your company (the Visor) received an avalanche of e-mails and questions on the exercise, resulting primarily from our articles on the subject, was released the following statement:
"In addition to this, we will not make other comments. Given the extraordinary number of messages that came from uninformed people, do not answer to anyone that can not certify a good reason to ask for further details (such as journalists or academics). "
The Power of possible involvement in the attack is highly unlikely, because exercise would announce a national radio a few hours after the attack? But his reaction to questions regarding the exercise revealed a discomfort in dealing with these issues.
Translation for Megachip by Massimo Spiga.
Original article: "Peter Power Reveals More Details of 7 / 7 Terrorist Bombing Drills"
In December 2007, Power has been approached by a group of members of the group We Are Change. With education, they've explained who they were and what they were doing. He refused to answer their questions in front of a camera. He said he would not tolerate similar approaches.
Watch video:
Another sensational video:
The impressive statements made by Peter Power on TV July 7, 2005 (translation and subtitles in Italian by of luogocomune.net):
Megachip Note:
Peter Power wants to tell us that the simulation exercises are routine and a fact that the exercise of 7 July did not come out of the ordinary , has just 'coincided' with the actual attacks. A no-brainer. In fact
the scenarios defined 'walk through' have nothing routine. Even the simulation exercise of the company's Power attacks was no coincidence isolated. Both
during the London bombings, both at 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States exercises that were being replicated scenarios very close to what really happened.
To justify the lack of preparedness of U.S. defense before the September 11 attacks, commentators well accredited to the mass media to spread wide and governments have talked about events 'unpredictable'.
But there are other facts that, far from accreditation unpredictability, precognitions seem exceptional. Similar exercises had been carried out. As you've read about " USA Today," in the two years preceding the September 11 attacks, "the command of the air defense of the North American region [North American Aerospace Defense Command, NORAD, responsible for air defense of U.S. and Canada] has conducted exercises simulating what the White House has since qualified unimaginable [...]: the use of hijacked airplanes as weapons crashing into them on the objectives. "There is therefore the umbrella of a procedure that removes stains of suspicion the actions they are repaired. Who prepares an attack may include operations fragmented into many actions that are inserted in the framework of the exercises.
good representation of tables rich with historical and deeply disturbing interpretation of the many exercises of 9 / 11 is contained in a chapter of the book "ZERO". The chapter was written by Webster Griffin Tarpley and is called "Anatomy of a Coup d'Etat.
An article in The New York Times, just 20 days after the events in London reported the findings of many members of the police and intelligence measures to exclude that the four alleged terrorists had planned to kill himself, but because they were "duped up to a trap letale ». Lo scenario che emerge in quest’ipotesi è che i supposti attentatori siano stati in qualche modo coinvolti in un’impresa che però non controllavano.
Nel programma Day Side del canale FOX News del 29 luglio 2005 l’esperto di terrorismo John Loftus, già procuratore al Dipartimento USA della Giustizia, spiegò che la presunta ‘mente’ degli attentati londinesi, Haroon Rashid Aswat, era una risorsa dell’intelligence britannica .
Sono scenari che - quando il dibattito era più libero e perciò capace di approssimarsi alla verità – sarebbero stati definiti da “Terrorismo di Stato” anche nei media mainstream.
0 comments:
Post a Comment